Meeting 1 Reflections

  • The random-criteria evaluation wasn’t hugely valuable; we should try doing it in series (to make everyone look through different frames) and also try cutting it to see what difference it makes
  • We should make a blog page about how DEFO meetings are run.
  • It seemed fine to not have someone taking minutes, though it did hamper figuring out how we could be more time-efficient.
  • That said, we could have started some of our brainstorming earlier in the discussion process (by just writing things down while talking).
  • It doesn’t seem worth it to have the theme known in advance (though the person responsible for providing background material should be known).
  • After we finish testing the randomized evaluation, we should try splitting the meeting between two weeks; the first one spent brainstorming, the second developing the chosen idea.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>